Standard of Proof
The standard of proof from a wrongful death suit is typically considered to be preponderance of the evidence. This means that in order for the defendant to be found guilty, the evidence must appear more that the person is guilty of causing the death as opposed to not causing the death. Effectively, if it appears that there is a greater than 50% chance that the defendant is guilty; the plaintiff will lose the suit. However, the dollar amount that the plaintiff is seeking may still not be assigned even if they win. The dollar amount granted will be assessed by the court.
Historical Cases
Since a wrongful death suit uses a preponderance of the evidence as standard of proof and the standard criminal process for manslaughter or murder requires the plaintiff to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, it is possible that a defendant could be proved innocent by the criminal court, but guilty in the civil court. This is most evident in the OJ Simpson murder case when he was declared innocent in the criminal court system, but he was found liable in the civil court system when he was sued for wrongful death. Another example of a wrongful death suit is when the families of lung cancer victims attempted to sue companies in the tobacco industry.
This article is provided as information only and not intended as legal advice in any means or manner whatsoever, Attorney Andrew M. Lamkin provides focused legal counsel within the area of wrongful death, and has provided this for informational purposes only.